top of page
faudii_Ever_wonder_how_we_learn_Behaviorism_says_its_all_abou_9c5dd397-612b-4a0f-9bd8-1cab

LDT100x Wk 04 : Constructivism

Constructivism is a learning theory that emphasizes the active role of the learner in constructing knowledge. It proposes that we construct our own understanding of the world, shaped by individual beliefs and viewpoints, through reflection and active mental processes.

Constructivism argues that knowledge cannot be simply transferred to a student; it must be actively constructed by the learner.

The Researchers
Two influential researchers in this field are Jean Piaget (1896-1980), who focused on how children construct knowledge through interactions with their environment, and Lev Vygotsky (1896-1934), who highlighted the importance of social interaction and cultural context in learning. While Vygotsky agreed with Piaget that learners respond to their interpretations of stimuli rather than the stimuli themselves, he emphasized the crucial role of language in knowledge construction, a factor he felt Piaget overlooked.

Connections to teaching and learning

This theory positions students in the center and the role of education is to provide experiences within their Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and encourage them through Scaffolding, Dynamic Assessment, Collaborative Learning, Transactive Discussions, and Inquiry-based LearningJohn Dewey's (1859-1952) work is relevant here, as he advocated for experiential learning and inquiry-based education, emphasizing the importance of connecting learning to real-world experiences and encouraging active problem-solvingConstructivism also asserts that active engagement requires learner motivation, whether extrinsic, intrinsic, or a combination of both


Implications for Instructional Design
In the context of instructional design and online teaching, constructivism provides an array of student-centered approaches, such as Reciprocal Teaching, Cooperative Learning, Situated Learning, and Anchored Instruction, allowing instructional designers the freedom to create truly engaging learning environments. John Keller (1983),  ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, Satisfaction) model of motivation, provides a valuable tool for instructional designers to create engaging learning activities that are authentic and tailored to the learner's ZPD.

 

With the application of constructivist theory, instructional designers can create learning systems that are relevant, engaging, and connected to real-world problems. These systems provide opportunities for learners to interact, share ideas, and learn from each other, fostering a dynamic and collaborative learning environment.

Application of constructivism for k-5

When applying constructivism to K-5 education, it's crucial to consider Piaget's stages of cognitive development. His stage 2 (preoperational, ages 2-7) and stage 3 (concrete operational, ages 7-11) offer insights into how children construct knowledge and interact with their peers, during their stages of cognetive development.
 

A core principle of constructivism is that knowledge is built through active engagement, often in a social context like a classroom. However, in stage 2, egocentrism is dominant. Children at this stage assume everyone shares their perspective, which can hinder collaborative knowledge construction. Differing viewpoints might lead to frustration rather than shared understanding.
 

Therefore, pure constructivism may not be the most effective approach for K-2 learners. Activities centered on individual exploration and discovery might be more suitable for this age group.
 

On the other hand, children in grades 3-5 (stage 3) are developing logical reasoning and empathy. This makes it an ideal time to introduce constructivist principles like collaborative learning, discussions, and problem-solving. These experiences can prepare them for more complex constructivist learning in later grades (stage 4 and beyond).
 

Therefore, a nuanced approach to applying constructivism in K-5 education might be:

  • K-2 (ages 5-7): Lean more towards behaviorism, (or it could still be within their ZPD, What the learner can achieve on their own)  with a focus on clear instructions, repetition, and positive reinforcement, while incorporating elements of individual exploration and discovery.

  • 3-5 (ages 8-11): Gradually introduce constructivist approaches like collaborative activities, discussions, and problem-solving to foster social learning and knowledge construction.
     

This approach acknowledges the developmental stages of young learners and provides a foundation for more complex constructivist learning in later years.

an online learning experience with constructivism as the primary learning theory

Learning Scenario: Gamified Dhivehi Language Learning (Constructivist Approach)

This scenario builds upon the previously designed gamified platform for Wk002, but with a greater emphasis on constructivist principles for grades 3-5.
 

Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and Activities:

  • What the learner can achieve on their own:

    • The platform provides gamified videos and interactive exercises where students independently explore Dhivehi language concepts, stories, and vocabulary.

    • Students record their observations and reflections in a digital diary, fostering metacognitive awareness and independent learning.

    • This zone caters to both K-2 and 3-5 learners, providing a foundation for individualized exploration.
       

  • What the learner can achieve with guidance:

    • A discussion forum facilitates collaborative learning, where groups of 4-5 learners discuss the subject matter, share their findings, and compare perspectives.

    • Teachers actively monitor these discussions, providing scaffolding through hints, questions, and prompts to encourage deeper inquiry and knowledge construction.

      • For example, if a student misidentifies a dolphin as a fish, the teacher might encourage fact-checking or revisiting relevant resources.

    • This scaffolding fosters transactive discussions, where learners justify their thinking, challenge each other's ideas, and engage in inquiry-based learning.

  • Learning that is beyond the child's grasp:

    • More complex language concepts, grammatical structures, or nuanced cultural expressions may require additional scaffolding and explicit instruction.

    • Teachers can identify these areas through observation and assessment, providing targeted support to bridge the knowledge gap.
       

Scaffolding and Social Constructivist Strategies:

  • Scaffolding: Teachers use a combination of questioning, prompting, and providing resources to guide learners towards deeper understanding and problem-solving.

  • Social Constructivism: The discussion forum fosters collaborative knowledge construction, where learners share ideas, challenge perspectives, and build upon each other's understanding.
     

Differentiation:

  • Mixed-grade grouping: Combining students from grades 3-5 in discussion forums can create a dynamic learning environment where learners benefit from diverse perspectives and varying levels of expertise.

  • Individualized support: Teachers provide tailored support based on individual needs and learning styles, offering additional resources, guidance, or challenges as needed.

  • Culturally relevant content: The platform incorporates culturally relevant examples and activities to make learning more meaningful and engaging for Maldivian children.
     

This constructivist approach leverages the strengths of social interaction, active engagement, and individualized support to create a rich and effective learning experience that fosters a love for the Dhivehi language and promotes deeper understanding.

Sources

McLeod, S. A. (2023). Constructivism learning theory & philosophy of education. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html

​

Jalal, N. (2024). Exploring the Constructivist Approach in Education: Theory, Practice, and Implications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379669385_Exploring_the_Constructivist_Approach_in_Education_Theory_Practice_and_Implications


Gemini 1.5 (2025) All texts run through Gemini for format, grammer check and flow with the prompt "Could you please rewrite the following while correcting grammer and suggesting a good flow, stick to original text and context .... "

bottom of page