Overview of the Dick and Carey model​

​

The Dick and Carey Model provides a systematic, yet in my view, adaptable framework for instructional design. It breaks down the design process into ten interconnected steps, offering a granular approach to addressing the complex requirements of creating effective learning experiences.  The model's strength lies in providing a structured process that facilitates managing the inherent complexity of designing learner-centered and responsive instruction.

Given the iterative nature of designing effective and adaptive learning experiences, I approach the application of the model by clustering the ten stages of the Dick and Carey model to facilitate a more manageable and flexible design process.

​

Cluster One: Defining Objectives and Analysis

This cluster focuses on establishing the foundation for the instructional design.

• Stage 1: Identifying Instructional Goals:

  • This initial stage involves conducting a thorough needs assessment to determine the "What is it that I am trying to get out of this set of instructions?"

  • The outcome is a comprehensive goal statement that includes, among other things, a clear articulation of the target learner profiles and the specific skills or knowledge learners will acquire upon successful completion of the course.

• Stage 2: Conducting Instructional Analysis:

  • This stage involves a detailed analysis of the skills and knowledge identified in Stage 1, categorizing them within relevant learning domains.

  • This analysis informs the selection of appropriate instructional strategies and helps tailor the learning experience to different learning styles.

• Stage 3: Analyzing Learners and Contexts:

  • Here, a learner analysis is conducted to understand the learners' prior knowledge, skills, and characteristics.

  • This may involve researching demographic factors, cultural exposure, and aligning the content with learners' Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD).

  • The results of this analysis guide decisions about content complexity and the pace of instruction.

• Stage 4: Writing Performance Objectives:

  • This stage involves defining clear and measurable performance objectives, essentially answering the question: "Upon completion of this course, the learner shall be able to..."

  • These objectives serve as the basis for designing assessments and evaluating learner outcomes.

• Stage 5: Developing Criterion-Referenced Assessments:

  • In this stage, assessments are designed to directly measure learners' achievement of the performance objectives defined in Stage 4.

  • These assessments validate the learner's competency and mastery of the intended learning outcomes.

​

Cluster Two: Culmination of the Instructions

This cluster involves the iterative development of instructional strategies and materials.

• Stages 6 and 7: Developing Instructional Strategy and Developing and Selecting Instructional Materials:

  • These two stages are treated as a tightly coupled, iterative process.

  • Stage 6 (Instructional Strategy Development) involves outlining the overall instructional approach, encompassing the course goals, current situation analysis, identified learning gap, learning objectives, and assessment approach.

  • Stage 7 (Developing and Selecting Instructional Materials) focuses on the actual creation or selection of content, materials, and tools aligned with the instructional strategy, objectives, and assessments.

  • This iterative loop requires continuous feedback from Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and consideration of budget and resource constraints, leading to a practical and feasible design solution.

​

Cluster Three: Implementation and Feedback

This cluster focuses on delivering and evaluating the instruction.

• Stage 8: Conducting Formative Evaluation of Instruction:

  • Formative evaluation is conducted throughout the implementation process to gather ongoing feedback and make necessary adjustments.

• Stage 9: Conducting Summative Evaluation:

  • Summative evaluation assesses the overall effectiveness of the course and determines whether the learning objectives were achieved.

• Stage 10: Revising Instruction:

  • This stage involves ongoing revision of the instructional materials and strategies based on the feedback and data gathered during both formative and summative evaluations.

​

Implications of the Dick and Carey Model for Instructional (Learning) Design

The Dick and Carey Model, while providing a robust and structured framework, can be adapted to accommodate the dynamic nature of technology-enhanced learning. In my view, its implications for instructional design are significant:

• Iterative Design: The model encourages a more iterative approach, particularly in the Development and Evaluation phases, allowing for continuous refinement based on feedback and data.

• Systematic Approach: The model's systematic breakdown of the design process ensures that all essential elements of instruction are considered, from learner analysis to assessment design.

• Alignment of Components: The model emphasizes the importance of aligning learning objectives, instructional strategies, assessment methods, and learning materials to create a cohesive and effective learning experience.

• Data-Driven Decisions: The model, especially when coupled with technology, facilitates data-driven decision-making by providing a framework for collecting and analyzing learner data to inform instructional design.

• Flexibility and Adaptability: While the model can be linear, its phases can be adapted and revisited as needed, allowing for flexibility in response to changing needs and learner feedback.

​

How This Approach Addresses Complexity and its Limitations​

To achieve the desired connection between this course (Dhivehi Language STEM & Arts Introductory Micro Course) and its broader goal of fostering a nation of critical thinkers with expertise in their chosen fields—a connection measured by Level 4 (Results) of Donald Kirkpatrick's model—and to simultaneously optimize Level 1 (Reaction), a granular design approach is crucial.

 

I find that the Dick and Carey model provides a framework to manage the inherent complexity of creating the learner-centered and adaptable course design that I aim to produce, incorporating learning models (behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism), hybrid learning modalities, Project-Based Learning (PBL), Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) principles, and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) guidelines.

​

I argue that the perceived complexity and resource-intensiveness of the Dick and Carey Model are not inherent limitations but rather a reflection of the complex nature of effective instructional design. Designing learner-centered and adaptive learning experiences requires a granular and systematic approach. The model's detailed stages provide a framework for managing this complexity, preventing designers from becoming overwhelmed by the myriad of factors to consider.

​

By clustering the stages and leveraging technology to support iteration, the Dick and Carey Model can be a powerful tool for creating high-quality, effective, and engaging learning experiences in a variety of contexts.​​​​​

​